三星 Galaxy S7 Edge 智能手机简短评测

三星 Galaxy S7 Edge 智能手机简短评测建立标准！Galaxy S7 Edge肯定不算是满载突破性创新，不过它将最尖端的科技完美融合于机身之内，理所应当是同类产品中的一座风向标。不过，它也有一些值得一提的缺点，同时我们也希望三星可以在一些方面更勇于改变。Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 04/09/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇳🇱 🇷🇺 🇮🇹 🇹🇷 🇸🇪 Android ARM Galaxy S Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Galaxy Series)ProcessorSamsung Exynos 8890 Octa 8c/8t 8 x 2.6 GHz, Mongoose / Cortex-A53Graphics adapterARM Mali-T880 MP12, Core: 650 MHz, Vulkan, OpenGL ES 3.1Memory4 GB , LP-DDR4 RAMDisplay5.50 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel, 电容式，10点触控，弧线屏幕边缘, Super AMOLED, glossy: yesStorage32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 32 GB , 24.4 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机麦克风接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 200 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 近距传感器，加速传感器，位置传感器，环境光传感器，旋转传感器，方向传感器，重力传感器，电子指南针，气压计，心率计, OTG, Ant+, MSTNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, LTE, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 150.9 x 72.6Battery13.86 Wh, 3600 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.85 伏Operating SystemAndroid 6.0 MarshmallowCameraPrimary Camera: 12.2 MPix (索尼IMX260传感器, f/1.7, 自动对焦, 图像防抖, 追踪对焦, HDR, UHD视频拍摄, 慢镜头, 快进拍摄, 支持RAW)Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (定焦, f/1.7, HDR, 美化模式)Additional featuresSpeakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器，数据线，OTG转接头，耳机，快速开始说明，安全说明, TouchWiz UI, Gear, Galaxy apps, S Health, S Voice, voice recorder, S Planner, myGalaxy, upday, 24 Months Warranty, IP68 认证, 头部辐射值: 0.264 W/kg, 身体辐射值: 0.507 W/kg, 快速充电, 无线充电 (WPC/PMA), fanlessWeight157 g

Price799 EuroLinksSamsung notebook sectionNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

Google Nexus 6P Apple iPhone 6S Plus Sony Xperia Z5 Premium OnePlus 2 Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Motorola Moto X Force LG G4 Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Huawei Mate S Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge DIN A6 ❌

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

Garmin Edge 500

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3click to load imagesSamsung Galaxy S7 EdgeApple iPhone 6s PlusOnePlus 2Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy S7 EdgeApple iPhone 6s PlusOnePlus 2Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesSamsung Galaxy S7 EdgeApple iPhone 6s PlusOnePlus 2Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x

555cd/m²557cd/m²555cd/m²543cd/m²554cd/m²557cd/m²532cd/m²557cd/m²554cd/m²

Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 557 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 551.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.77 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 96 %Center on Battery: 554 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.59 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.01 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}99.98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)82.12% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)93.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)86% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.01CCT: 6321 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeSuper AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeSuper AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumIPS, 3840x2160, 5.5"Microsoft Lumia 950 XLAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"Apple iPhone 6S PlusIPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"Google Nexus 6PAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"Huawei Mate 8IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 6"Screen-21%-202%-35%-36%-14%-79%Brightness middle (cd/m²)554343 -38%560 1%297 -46%583 5%363 -34%514 -7%Brightness (cd/m²)552338 -39%541 -2%297 -46%560 1%365 -34%513 -7%Brightness Distribution (%)9694 -2%85 -11%93 -3%91 -5%90 -6%94 -2%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.450.460.35Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.592.2 -38%9.19 -478%2.67 -68%3.55 -123%2.34 -47%5.08 -219%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.5615.01 -486%3.98 -55%8.28 -223%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.012.37 -18%10.58 -426%2.81 -40%3.88 -93%1.03 49%5.49 -173%Gamma2.01 109%2.41 91%2.7 81%2.08 106%2.2 100%2.23 99%2.08 106%CCT6321 103%6425 101%9760 67%6379 102%7280 89%6429 101%7254 90%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%)82.1287.77 7%73.19 -11%66.31 -19%59.05 -28%79.95 -3%Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%)99.9899.79 0%92.8 -7%99.84 0%Contrast (:1)124412671469* ... smaller is better

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise↘ 6 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise↘ 6 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 HzThe display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7611 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

2170 (2120min) Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

1503 Points -31%Huawei Mate 8

1721 Points -21%Huawei Mate S

941 Points -57%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

2538 Points +17%OnePlus 2

1140 Points -47%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

1335 Points -38%Google Nexus 6P

1335 Points -38%LG G4

1107 Points -49%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

2376 Points +9% 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

6480 (6415min) Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

5619 Points -13%Huawei Mate 8

6265 Points -3%Huawei Mate S

3970 Points -39%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

4429 Points -32%OnePlus 2

4804 Points -26%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

4492 Points -31%Google Nexus 6P

4587 Points -29%LG G4

3556 Points -45%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

5500 Points -15%3DMark

2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

2710 (2421min) Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

1505 Points -44%Huawei Mate 8

1244 Points -54%Huawei Mate S

373 Points -86%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

3316 Points +22%OnePlus 2

1734 Points -36%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

2009 Points -26%Google Nexus 6P

1877 Points -31%LG G4

1324 Points -51%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

3015 (2895min) Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

1492 Points -51%Huawei Mate 8

1092 Points -64%Huawei Mate S

315 Points -90%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

4557 Points +51%OnePlus 2

1854 Points -39%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

2336 Points -23%Google Nexus 6P

2302 Points -24%LG G4

1399 Points -54%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

2002 (1539min) Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

1553 Points -22%Huawei Mate 8

2432 Points +21%Huawei Mate S

1052 Points -47%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

1697 Points -15%OnePlus 2

1414 Points -29%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

1348 Points -33%Google Nexus 6P

1142 Points -43%LG G4

1115 Points -44%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

2204 (1923min) Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

1186 Points -46%Huawei Mate 8

945 Points -57%Huawei Mate S

311 Points -86%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

2318 Points +5%OnePlus 2

938 Points -57%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

1132 Points -49%Google Nexus 6P

1519 Points -31%LG G4

513 Points -77%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

2207 Points 0%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

2229 (2043min) Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

1152 Points -48%Huawei Mate 8

801 Points -64%Huawei Mate S

259 Points -88%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

2601 Points +17%OnePlus 2

846 Points -62%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

1074 Points -52%Google Nexus 6P

1589 Points -29%LG G4

440 Points -80%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

2773 Points +24%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

2121 (1594min) Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

1320 Points -38%Huawei Mate 8

2552 Points +20%Huawei Mate S

1051 Points -50%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

1676 Points -21%OnePlus 2

1517 Points -28%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

1402 Points -34%Google Nexus 6P

1317 Points -38%LG G4

1216 Points -43%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

1288 Points -39%PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

4660 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

5050 Points +8%Huawei Mate 8

7344 Points +58%Huawei Mate S

4872 Points +5%OnePlus 2

4282 Points -8%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

5094 Points +9%Google Nexus 6P

4716 Points +1%LG G4

4579 Points -2%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

6590 Points +41%BaseMark OS II

Overall (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

2074 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

1821 Points -12%Huawei Mate 8

2046 Points -1%Huawei Mate S

1222 Points -41%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

2206 Points +6%OnePlus 2

1681 Points -19%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

1649 Points -20%Google Nexus 6P

1405 Points -32%LG G4

1596 Points -23%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

2410 Points +16% System (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

4080 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

3989 Points -2%Huawei Mate 8

4064 Points 0%Huawei Mate S

2129 Points -48%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

3925 Points -4%OnePlus 2

2536 Points -38%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

2737 Points -33%Google Nexus 6P

1798 Points -56%LG G4

2368 Points -42%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

3600 Points -12% Memory (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

2072 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

1426 Points -31%Huawei Mate 8

2339 Points +13%Huawei Mate S

1304 Points -37%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

1124 Points -46%OnePlus 2

1297 Points -37%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

876 Points -58%Google Nexus 6P

1136 Points -45%LG G4

1558 Points -25%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

2035 Points -2% Graphics (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

2203 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

2489 Points +13%Huawei Mate 8

1636 Points -26%Huawei Mate S

962 Points -56%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

4299 Points +95%OnePlus 2

2631 Points +19%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

3137 Points +42%Google Nexus 6P

2424 Points +10%LG G4

1995 Points -9%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

4710 Points +114%PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1

System (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

8049 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

8438 Points +5%Huawei Mate 8

6990 Points -13%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

7975 Points -1%OnePlus 2

6462 Points -20%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

7332 Points -9%LG G4

7695 Points -4% CPU Tests (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

225427 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

176225 Points -22%Huawei Mate 8

270825 Points +20%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

47850 Points -79%OnePlus 2

126720 Points -44%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

127736 Points -43%LG G4

103512 Points -54% Disk Tests (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

36364 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

68872 Points +89%Huawei Mate 8

74503 Points +105%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

96768 Points +166%OnePlus 2

44133 Points +21%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

34121 Points -6%LG G4

67837 Points +87% Memory Tests (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

6136 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

6924 Points +13%Huawei Mate 8

7338 Points +20%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

18062 Points +194%OnePlus 2

6632 Points +8%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

6631 Points +8%LG G4

6223 Points +1% 2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

6382 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

5274 Points -17%Huawei Mate 8

6747 Points +6%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

4818 Points -25%OnePlus 2

5395 Points -15%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

5907 Points -7%LG G4

4850 Points -24% 3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

2131 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

2345 Points +10%Huawei Mate 8

1548 Points -27%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

1972 Points -7%OnePlus 2

1534 Points -28%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

1857 Points -13%LG G4

2179 Points +2%Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

733 Points Huawei Mate 8

347 Points -53%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

858 Points +17%OnePlus 2

427 Points -42%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

478 Points -35%Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

13.31 fps Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

9.97 fps -25%Huawei Mate 8

7.9 fps -41%OnePlus 2

15.68 fps +18%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

14.52 fps +9%LG G4

8.74 fps -34%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

22.7 fps +71%AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

128749 Points Huawei Mate 8

93767 Points -27%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

133626 Points +4%OnePlus 2

65936 Points -49%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

78324 Points -39%Google Nexus 6P

79502 Points -38%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

131327 Points +2%GFXBench 3.1

on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

15 fps Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

6.1 fps -59%Huawei Mate 8

11 fps -27%Huawei Mate S

4.4 fps -71%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

28 fps +87%OnePlus 2

19 fps +27%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

19 fps +27%Google Nexus 6P

9.5 fps -37%LG G4

5.7 fps -62%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

15 fps 0%1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

28 fps Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge

13 fps -54%Huawei Mate 8

10 fps -64%Huawei Mate S

3.9 fps -86%Apple iPhone 6S Plus

28 fps 0%OnePlus 2

19 fps -32%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

18 fps -36%Google Nexus 6P

16 fps -43%LG G4

10 fps -64%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

31 fps +11%GFXBench

on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

7.9 fps Huawei Mate 8

6.7 fps -15%OnePlus 2

11 fps +39%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

6.1 fps -23%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

9.4 fps +19%1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

15 fps Huawei Mate 8

6.2 fps -59%OnePlus 2

11 fps -27%Sony Xperia Z5 Premium

5.8 fps -61%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP

18 fps +20%Legend

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash Huawei Mate S HiSilicon Kirin 935, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash LG G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530,

WebXPRT 2015 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | BaseMark OS II WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)

Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

163 Points Huawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash

139 Points -15%Huawei Mate SMali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash

73 Points -55%Apple iPhone 6S PlusA9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

190 Points +17%OnePlus 2Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash

80 Points -51%Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

106 Points -35%Google Nexus 6PAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

116 Points -29%LG G4Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash

82 Points -50%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

108 Points -34%Microsoft Lumia 950 XLAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

113 Points -31%Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)

Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

13191 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeMali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

8650 Points -34%Huawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash

11329 Points -14%Huawei Mate SMali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash

4106 Points -69%Apple iPhone 6S PlusA9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

15967 Points +21%OnePlus 2Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash

6955 Points -47%Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

8851 Points -33%Google Nexus 6PAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

8804 Points -33%LG G4Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash

7832 (6791min) Points -41%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

10559 Points -20%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

8395 Points -36%Microsoft Lumia 950 XLAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

8059 Points -39%JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total (sort by value)

Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

75.1 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeMali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

49.19 Points -35%Huawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash

65 Points -13%Huawei Mate SMali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash

25.41 Points -66%Apple iPhone 6S PlusA9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

118.7 Points +58%OnePlus 2Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash

44.29 Points -41%Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

48.2 Points -36%Google Nexus 6PAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

47.4 Points -37%LG G4Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash

43.12 Points -43%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

64 Points -15%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

55 Points -27%Microsoft Lumia 950 XLAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

46 Points -39%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)

Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

2564 ms * Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeMali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

4037 ms * -57%Huawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash

3643 ms * -42%Huawei Mate SMali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash

11029 ms * -330%Apple iPhone 6S PlusA9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

1743 ms * +32%OnePlus 2Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash

6585 ms * -157%Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

4377 ms * -71%Google Nexus 6PAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

4193 ms * -64%LG G4Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash

4771 ms * -86%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

6310 ms * -146%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

2460 ms * +4%Microsoft Lumia 950 XLAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

5553 ms * -117%BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)

Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

994 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeMali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

778 Points -22%Huawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash

1127 Points +13%Huawei Mate SMali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash

834 Points -16%Apple iPhone 6S PlusA9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

1199 Points +21%OnePlus 2Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash

923 Points -7%Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

986 Points -1%Google Nexus 6PAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

791 Points -20%LG G4Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash

881 Points -11%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

985 Points -1%Microsoft Lumia 950 XLAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

837 Points -16%* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5 | PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 | BaseMark OS II AndroBench 3-5

Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

487.3 MB/s Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeMali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

319.3 MB/s -34%Huawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash

238.3 MB/s -51%Huawei Mate SMali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash

144 MB/s -70%OnePlus 2Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash

234.2 MB/s -52%Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

256.8 MB/s -47%Google Nexus 6PAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

236.3 MB/s -52%LG G4Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash

251 MB/s -48%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

439 MB/s -10% Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

145.1 MB/s Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeMali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

139.1 MB/s -4%Huawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash

124.8 MB/s -14%Huawei Mate SMali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash

103.4 MB/s -29%OnePlus 2Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash

125.5 MB/s -14%Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

99.4 MB/s -31%Google Nexus 6PAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

122.5 MB/s -16%LG G4Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash

153 MB/s +5%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

142 MB/s -2% Random Read 4KB (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

86.7 MB/s Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeMali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

77.4 MB/s -11%Huawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash

24.98 MB/s -71%Huawei Mate SMali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash

27.25 MB/s -69%OnePlus 2Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash

21.87 MB/s -75%Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

19.11 MB/s -78%Google Nexus 6PAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

20.1 MB/s -77%LG G4Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash

31.5 MB/s -64%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

101 MB/s +16% Random Write 4KB (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

15.79 MB/s Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeMali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

19.84 MB/s +26%Huawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash

15.74 MB/s 0%Huawei Mate SMali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash

17.74 MB/s +12%OnePlus 2Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash

13.94 MB/s -12%Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

14.53 MB/s -8%Google Nexus 6PAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

11.79 MB/s -25%LG G4Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash

15 MB/s -5%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

12.9 MB/s -18% Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

76.4 MB/s Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

50.4 MB/s PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - Disk Tests (sort by value)

Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

36364 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeMali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

68872 Points +89%Huawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash

74503 Points +105%Apple iPhone 6S PlusA9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

96768 Points +166%OnePlus 2Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash

44133 Points +21%Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

34121 Points -6%LG G4Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash

67837 Points +87%BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)

Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

2072 Points Samsung Galaxy S6 EdgeMali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

1426 Points -31%Huawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash

2339 Points +13%Huawei Mate SMali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash

1304 Points -37%Apple iPhone 6S PlusA9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

1124 Points -46%OnePlus 2Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash

1297 Points -37%Sony Xperia Z5 PremiumAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

876 Points -58%Google Nexus 6PAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

1136 Points -45%LG G4Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash

1558 Points -25%Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDPAdreno 530, 820 MSM8996

2035 Points -2%Microsoft Lumia 950 XLAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash

1945 Points -6%

Asphalt 8: Airborne SettingsValue high31 fps very low30 fps

Real Racing 3 SettingsValue high44 fps

... in comparison

Temple Run 2 SettingsValue default60 fps

... in comparison

Dead Trigger 2 SettingsValue high56 fps

... in comparison

Max. LoadIdle

40 °C39.8 °C37.2 °C39 °C38.7 °C35.5 °C37.3 °C36 °C33.6 °C

Maximum: 40 °CAverage: 37.5 °C

35.4 °C37.6 °C39.1 °C34.7 °C36.7 °C35.4 °C33.9 °C34 °C34.3 °C

Maximum: 39.1 °CAverage: 35.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 30.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle

27.7 °C27.4 °C26.8 °C28.3 °C27 °C26.3 °C27.5 °C27.1 °C26.2 °C

Maximum: 28.3 °CAverage: 27.1 °C

25.9 °C26.8 °C26.7 °C26.4 °C26.8 °C26.6 °C25.8 °C25.6 °C26.5 °C

Maximum: 26.8 °CAverage: 26.3 °C Power Supply (max.) 26.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.01 / 0.09 WattIdle 0.63 / 1.1 / 1.56 Watt

Load

5.95 / 6.7 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 FlashSamsung Galaxy S6 EdgeMali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 FlashMotorola Moto X ForceAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC FlashApple iPhone 6S PlusA9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)Microsoft Lumia 950 XLAdreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC FlashHuawei Mate 8Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC FlashPower Consumption18%-22%-9%-144%-21%Idle Minimum * (Watt)0.630.5 21%0.96 -52%0.5 21%2.85 -352%0.85 -35%Idle Average * (Watt)1.10.9 18%1.35 -23%1.9 -73%2.95 -168%2.07 -88%Idle Maximum * (Watt)1.561.3 17%1.4 10%2.2 -41%3.26 -109%2.28 -46%Load Average * (Watt)5.953.8 36%6.11 -3%3.2 46%8.92 -50%3.91 34%Load Maximum * (Watt)6.76.8 -1%9.43 -41%6.4 4%9.39 -40%4.69 30%* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)

27h 43min

WiFi Websurfing

12h 12min

Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p

15h 14min

Load (maximum brightness)

6h 32min

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge13.86 Wh, 95Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge10 Wh, 92Samsung Galaxy S711.55 Wh, 92.6Huawei Mate 8 Wh, 96Microsoft Lumia 950 XL13 Wh, 89.8Apple iPhone 6S Plus10 Wh, 91.9Motorola Moto X Force Wh, 91Sony Xperia Z5 Premium13 Wh, 91Battery runtime-36%-17%1%-43%-25%-21%-43%Reader / Idle (h)27.722.5 -19%30.2 9%31.2 13%18 -35%27.6 0%26.8 -3%21.3 -23%H.264 (h)15.27 -54%14.9 -2%16.1 6%10.2 -33%11.9 -22%11.8 -22%6.9 -55%WiFi v1.3 (h)12.28.9 -27%7.6 -38%14.4 18%6.2 -49%8.6 -30%7.1 -42%6.2 -49%Load (h)6.53.7 -43%4 -38%4.3 -34%3 -54%3.3 -49%5.5 -15%3.5 -46%

Pros+ 优异的相机

+ 极速处理器

+ 可扩展存储空间

+ 防尘防水(IP68)

+ 出色的屏幕

+ 超长电池续航时间

+ 快速充电和无线充电

+ 通话音质

+ 附赠效果优秀的耳机

+ 附赠OTG转接头Cons- 无红外传感器

- 无收音机

- 专业模式中的实时取景不总是可靠

- 仅支持micro-USB 2.0

- 不支持MHL或SlimPort

In review: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de三星开发了一款不管是外观还是性能都十分出色的智能手机，它足以成为同类产品的新标杆。这家韩国生产商应该还可以为它提供更好的连接性，比如最新的LTE标准以及最新的接口标准。它没有采用USB C型接口让人有些失望。

除此之外，这台三星智能手机让人无可挑剔。它的屏幕是截稿时我们测试过的智能手机中最优秀的，它的相机在暗光环境下也能拍摄效果极佳的照片。除此之外，惊人的电池续航时间则让它相比标准版的Galaxy S7有了更高的价值。屏幕的弧形边缘看起来很新颖，是否喜欢则要用户自行判断了。弧线形的屏幕所带来的额外功能十分有限。

三星的Galaxy S7 Edge兼具高性能，明亮屏幕，出色相机和超长电池续航。

三星凭借全新的Galaxy S7系列守住了在我们智能手机排行榜中的领先位置。不过，最新的机型更像是例行维护，而缺少创新的光芒。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

- 12/09/2016 v6 (old)

Daniel Schmidt

Chassis94%

Keyboard72 / 75 → 96%

Pointing Device92%

Connectivity51 / 60 → 85%

Weight92 / 50-100 → 84%

Battery95%

Display92%

Games Performance59 / 63 → 93%

Application Performance60 / 70 → 86%

Temperature91%

Noise100%

Audio69 / 91 → 76%

Camera94%

Average82%

91%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Add as a preferred source on Google

1、cf躲猫猫模式详细规则
新浪移动_手机新浪网_用户设置

三星 Galaxy S7 Edge 智能手机简短评测

2026-10-06 12:32:36 | 世界杯cctv5